Where it applies
Written for the jurisdictions listed here.
The most consequential Utah provision for a veteran in trouble with the law, and the one whose eligibility definition departs furthest from the rest of the code.
The definition that matters most. Section 78A-5-302, subsection 7: "'Veteran' means a former service member who qualifies for health care benefits from the Veterans Administration."
That is it. No 180 days. No honorable or general discharge. No wartime period. The test is whether VA will give you health care, which turns on VA's own rules including a character-of-discharge determination that can find service honorable for VA purposes notwithstanding a bad paper discharge. A veteran shut out of the Utah property tax exemption, the tuition waivers, the resident tuition classification and the employment preference by an other than honorable discharge may still be a veteran for this part. Alongside the community college enrolment preference in section 53H-3-1103, which turns on "other than a dishonorable discharge", this is the widest door in Utah law.
"Service member" is separately defined in subsection 5 as a member of the active or reserve components of the armed forces as defined in section 68-3-12.5, or a member of the National Guard of the United States. "Defendant" in subsection 1 means "a veteran charged with a criminal offense".
Whether there is a court where you are. Section 78A-5-303, subsection 1: "The Judicial Council may create a veterans treatment court in any judicial district or geographic region that demonstrates: (a) the need for a veterans treatment court; and (b) the existence of a collaborative strategy" between the court, prosecutors, defence attorneys, substance abuse treatment services, the Department of Corrections and the VA Veterans Justice Outreach Program.
The verb is "may", and the unit is the judicial district. So this is not a statewide entitlement. The first question for any defendant is whether the district hearing the case has one, and the answer is a question for the court or for a VA Veterans Justice Outreach specialist rather than something the statute settles.
What the court must be. Subsection 3 requires "continuous judicial supervision using a cooperative approach with prosecutors, defense attorneys, substance abuse treatment services, the Department of Corrections, and the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Justice Outreach Program, as appropriate, to promote public safety, protect participants' due process rights, and integrate veteran treatment programs with the justice system case processing."
Subsection 4 sets the screening criteria a court must include: a plea in abeyance or plea agreement, or participation required as a condition of probation; frequent alcohol and drug testing if appropriate; participation in veteran outreach programmes including substance abuse treatment where appropriate; sanctions for noncompliance; and any additional criteria the court develops.
Who is eligible to be screened. Section 78A-5-307, subsection 1: a defendant is eligible to be screened if "(a) the defendant is a veteran; (b) the defendant has a mental-health condition, traumatic brain injury, or substance use disorder; (c) the defendant agrees on the court record to voluntarily: (i) participate...; (ii) enter into a plea in abeyance or plea agreement, or participate... as a condition of probation; and (iii) adhere to a participant agreement; and (d) as determined by the court, the defendant's participation... would be in the interest of justice and of benefit to the defendant and the community."
Paragraph (b) is broad: a mental health condition, a traumatic brain injury, or a substance use disorder. It does not require the condition to be service-connected, and it does not require a VA rating.
Paragraph (c) requires an on-the-record agreement to a plea in abeyance, a plea agreement, or probation. So entering the programme is not free: it involves a plea or a probation condition, and that is a decision to take with defence counsel rather than on the strength of this entry.
The ten factors the court weighs. Subsection 2 requires the court to consider the nature and circumstances of the offence; the defendant's special characteristics including "criminogenic risk and need"; criminal history and any previous participation in a veterans treatment court or similar programme; "whether the defendant's needs exceed treatment resources available to the veterans treatment court"; the impact on the community; special characteristics or circumstances of the victim or alleged victim; the provision for and likelihood of restitution; the prosecutor's recommendation; mitigating circumstances; and other circumstances reasonably related to the defendant, the case and available resources. Section 77-37-3, the victims' rights provision, applies to the determination.
The prosecutor has an effective veto. Section 78A-5-308: "For a defendant to be admitted to a veterans treatment court, the defendant and prosecutor must sign, and the court must approve, a participant agreement and a plea in abeyance, plea agreement, or probation agreement." Both signatures plus court approval. Subsection 2, paragraph (h) of section 78A-5-307 separately makes the prosecutor's recommendation a factor. So the prosecutor's position is central and is worth engaging early.
The participant agreement is the governing document. Section 78A-5-302, subsection 3 defines it as the record required by section 78A-5-304, subsection 1 of the court's policies and procedures "and any specific terms and conditions applicable to the defendant", and includes any modification under section 78A-5-310. Read it before signing; it is what you will be held to.
Domestic violence cases carry extra protections for the victim. Section 78A-5-309 requires that where a victim or alleged victim of a domestic violence offence that is the basis for participation "can be reasonably located", the victim must be offered referrals to domestic violence service providers and information on how to report an allegation of an offence committed by the defendant.
Sections 78A-5-310 through 78A-5-312 deal with modification or termination of the agreement, completion, and the fact that there is no right to participate. Section 78A-5-304 requires the court to keep a record of its policies and procedures, section 78A-5-305 governs those policies, and section 78A-5-306 allows supplemental ones. Section 76-3-402 is the general provision by which a court may enter a conviction for a lower degree of offence, which is the mechanism by which successful completion can change the outcome on the record.
Accountability. Section 78A-5-303, subsection 5 requires the Administrative Office of the Courts to report in writing to the Criminal Justice Appropriations Subcommittee by October 1 each year on the types of policies and procedures adopted, the number of veteran participants in the previous fiscal year, their outcomes, and recommendations including expansion and funding. That report is the public record of which courts exist and how many veterans they served.
The part was created by chapter 62 of the 2020 general session, the definitions were amended by chapter 44 of the 2023 general session, and section 78A-5-303 was amended by chapter 271 of the 2025 general session.