Housing
New Hampshire Tax Credit for Service-Connected Total Disability
A $700 credit statewide once the town has adopted RSA 72:35, which a town may raise to as much as $5,000. The statute gives the applicant a real evidentiary right: the assessors must treat the VA certification as conclusive unless they have specific contrary evidence and let the veteran rebut it.
Also called: 72:35, $700, $5,000, total and permanent, double amputee, paraplegic, conclusive on the question of disability, 2025 chapter 15, 2026 chapter 252.
For: Veteran or service member, survivor.
Where it applies
Written for the jurisdictions listed here.
- New HampshireState
Thresholds
| Gate | Rule |
|---|---|
| Total and permanent service-connected disability | RSA 72:35, I. The test is total and permanent service-connected disability rather than a rating percentage, and paragraph III(a) requires certification from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs that the applicant is rated totally and permanently disabled from service connection. |
| Or double amputation or paraplegia from a service-connected injury | RSA 72:35, I provides an alternative route for a person who "is a double amputee or paraplegic because of service-connected injury", with no permanence or total disability finding required. |
| A discharge of a character outlined in RSA 21:50 | 2026 chapter 252, section 7, effective August 31, 2026, replaced the older discharge language, so a general discharge under honorable conditions and an uncharacterized discharge based on a service-connected injury now qualify. |
| $700 where the town adopted RSA 72:35; $701 to $5,000 if it voted higher | RSA 72:35, I and I-a. Paragraph I-a states that the optional credit replaces the credits under RSA 72:28, 72:28-b, 72:28-c and 72:36-a in its entirety, and RSA 72:36-a is a full exemption from all taxation on an adapted homestead. |
| The VA certification is conclusive unless the town produces specific contrary evidence | RSA 72:35, III(a) and (b). The assessors must accept the certification as conclusive unless they hold specific contrary evidence and the applicant has had a reasonable opportunity to review and rebut it, and a denial must identify the evidence relied on. |
Sources
Legislation
Law the tracker is watching for this entry. See the legislation tracker for every jurisdiction.
Laws of New Hampshire 2026, chapter 252 Pointed the veteran benefit statutes at the RSA 21:50 discharge standard, widening several at once
- Introduced Done, , step 1 of 6
- In committee Done, , step 2 of 6
- Passed one chamber Done, , step 3 of 6
- Passed both chambers Done, , step 4 of 6
- Signed by the governor Done, , step 5 of 6
- In effect Done, , step 6 of 6
A conforming act with substantive effect. Effective August 31, 2026 it replaced older discharge language with a cross-reference to the definition in RSA 21:50 across the code, touching at least RSA 72:28-b (all veterans’ tax credit), RSA 72:35 (tax credit for service-connected total disability), RSA 72:36-a (exemption for a specially adapted homestead), RSA 119:1 and 119:2 (the New Hampshire Veterans’ Home and the qualifications of its board of managers), RSA 119:6 (veteran employment preference at the home), RSA 283:4 (preference in public employment) and RSA 261:86 (special number plates for former prisoners of war, Purple Heart recipients and Pearl Harbor survivors). Because RSA 21:50, I(a)(2) reaches an honorable discharge, a general discharge under honorable conditions and an uncharacterized discharge based on a service-connected injury, illness or disability, every one of those provisions is now open to a veteran with a general discharge who was previously outside it. RSA 72:28, the standard and optional wartime credit, was not amended and still requires an honorable discharge, so the two neighbouring property tax credits now carry different discharge tests. Tracked because no published New Hampshire benefit guidance reflects the change, a veteran refused before August 31, 2026 should apply again, and because RSA 72:27-a, IV arguably requires a town that previously adopted RSA 72:28-b, 72:35 or 72:36-a to vote again before the wider eligibility applies locally, which is unresolved.
Touches N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 72:28-b · N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 72:35 · N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 72:36-a · N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 119:1, 119:2 and 119:6 · N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 283:4 · N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 261:86
Also touches
Laws of New Hampshire 2018, chapter 105 Made the VA disability certification conclusive against a town unless it produces contrary evidence
- Introduced Done, , step 1 of 6
- In committee Done, , step 2 of 6
- Passed one chamber Done, , step 3 of 6
- Passed both chambers Done, , step 4 of 6
- Signed by the governor Done, , step 5 of 6
- In effect Done, , step 6 of 6
Rewrote RSA 72:35, III effective January 1, 2019. An applicant for the tax credit for service-connected total disability furnishes certification from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs that they are rated totally and permanently disabled from service connection, and the selectmen or assessors "shall accept such certification as conclusive on the question of disability unless they have specific contrary evidence and the applicant, or the applicant’s representative, has had a reasonable opportunity to review and rebut that evidence", with a further right to submit additional evidence on the question of disability. Any decision to deny "shall identify the evidence upon which the decision relied and shall be made within the time period provided by law", and the credit must be divided evenly among the number of tax payments the municipality requires annually. Tracked because it is the strongest procedural protection in the New Hampshire file and almost no benefit summary mentions it: a veteran whose credit is refused on an assessor’s doubt about the rating, or refused without reasons, has a specific statutory answer and an appeal under RSA 72:34-a to the board of tax and land appeals or the superior court.
Sponsor
- Gary Daniels
Touches N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 72:35, III
Updated
Last updated .
What changed then:
- Marked as updated, with no change to its text, figures or sources.
Request an update
Out of date, a broken link, or something else wrong? Say what you found, and an editor checks it against the official source.
Disclaimer
VetTOC is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense. Information is for reference only and is not an eligibility determination. Verify with VA, the relevant state or territory, or an accredited VSO.